What are Ecosystem Services?
Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008The term ecosystem service refers to the many services that are supplied to us by natural ecosystems.
More specifically, these services are ones that we value, and support our existence the way we know it.
Put another way:
Ecosystem services are the transformation of a set of natural assets (soil, plants and animals, air and water) into things that we value.
Another, well thought out, definition can be seen below.
Examples of Ecosystem Services
Here are some examples of ecosystem services (based on widely used definitions):
- Purification of air and water
- Mitigation of droughts and floods
- Maintenance of soil fertility
- Maintenance of soil health
- Maintenance of healthy waterways
- Waste absorption and breakdown
- Pollination of crops and natural vegetation
- Dispersal of seeds
- Cycling and movement of nutrients
- Control of the vast majority of potential agricultural pests
- Maintenance of biodiversity
- Protection of coastal shores from erosion by waves
- Provision of shade and shelter
- Partial stabilization of climate
- Moderation of weather extremes and their impacts
- Provision of aesthetic beauty and intellectual stimulation that lift the human spirit
The Importance of Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem services are important services that we need if we are to continue life on Earth as we know it.
Unfortunately, to date, ecosystem services haven’t been properly recognized in economic markets, government policies and land management practices. Because of this, ecosystem services are highly vulnerable to degradation.
If all the world’s ecosystems were to disappear, how would we recreate these services?
A Dollar Value for Ecosystem Services
One of the reasons ecosystems services have been undervalued is because of the difficulty in coming up with a dollar figure that accurately reflects the benefit of the services. Without being worth something in monetary terms, its highly unlikely that governments and other organizations are going to want to invest in ecosystem services.
There have been a number of attempts at valuating ecosystem services. Here are two examples:
- Science magazine - a highly respected journal - estimated the value of replicating just the most readily quantifiable ecosystem services at $30-$40 trillion per year. This is about the equivalent of the total Gross Planetary Product.
- Canopy Capital - a company aiming to drive capital into rainforests - have said that it would take the equivalent of 50,000 times the daily energy output of the world’s largest hydropower station to evaporate the 20 billion tonnes of water coming off the Amazon each day.
Measuring Ecosystem Services
One of the reasons it’s been so difficult in coming up with a dollar figure is because, there hasn’t been an effective way of measuring ecosystem services.
What exactly do you measure? And how do you measure it? If you were to walk down to the forest today, could you point at all the services and say how much of each service is there?
How do you judge nature’s value?
This issue is what Resources For the Future (RFF) has been working on for some years now. They sought to establish a definition that enabled more accountability of ecosystem services. Such a definition would help conservationists and governments define and manage ecosystem services.
In 2006, following a workshop involving various environmental groups, RFF released a discussion paper which put forward the following definition for ecosystem services:
Ecosystem services are components of nature, directly enjoyed, consumed, or used to yield human well-being
Using this definition, an ecosystem service would be restricted to the end product - rather than a process or function of the ecosystem. This is where it differs from other definitions, which tend to include processes and functions as a system.
For example, using the definition put forward by the RFF, water purification would not be an ecosystem service. Clean water would be.
As RFF put it, this definition aims at providing standardized environmental accounting units - it would provide a standardized way of counting nature’s benefits.